Language: English｜简体中文
English
Content prepared by: nanozeo.cn
First published: September 24, 2026
Updated: September 24, 2026
AI Summary
• Nano ZEO® maintains safety documentation for packaging-use ZEO powder/glue materials. SDS (formerly called MSDS) is available after the applicable product and use are confirmed.
• SGS report ETR23702513, dated 19 July 2023, reports all ten RoHS restricted substances as not detected (n.d.) for the sample named 纳米石 ZEO®速溶胶（ZEO/LMS-100-25）.
• Halogen report CE/2011/55802 reports fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine as not detected for the sample named 纳米 ZEO® 速溶熟胶（ZEO-LMS-100）.
• RoHS is legislation for electrical and electronic equipment. In packaging supply chains, the report is used as restricted-substance evidence; it is not a legal certification of the finished package.
• These records support the ZEO material used at corrugated-board bonding positions. They do not certify the complete sheet, finished package, food-contact surface, PFAS status or every untested substance.
Evidence Status at a Glance
SDS
Current evidence: Controlled SDS for the current product; available on request.
Appropriate use: Product safety communication after the product and use are confirmed.
RoHS ten substances
Current evidence: SGS ETR23702513; ten substances reported n.d.
Appropriate use: Restricted-substance evidence for the named ZEO glue sample and corresponding bonding application.
Halogens
Current evidence: CE/2011/55802; F, Cl, Br and I reported ND.
Appropriate use: Halogen evidence for the named ZEO-LMS-100 glue sample.
Formaldehyde
Current evidence: No intentionally added formaldehyde; no formal non-detect report.
Appropriate use: Formulation/process statement only.
PFAS, APEO and food contact
Current evidence: No dedicated reports currently available.
Appropriate use: Separate testing or market assessment required.
PPWR, TPCH or finished-package compliance
Current evidence: Not established by the RoHS report.
Appropriate use: Case-specific document review or finished-product testing required.
Why Do Packaging Customers Ask for Upstream Safety Documents?
Packaging plants are often asked by customers to collect safety documentation from every material supplier. This is especially common when the finished packaging is used for toys, electronic products or other goods subject to brand, retailer or supply-chain controls.
Nano ZEO glue is used inside the corrugated structure at bonding positions. It does not normally contact the packed item and is not present on the exposed outer surface of the package. Even so, downstream factories may still need SGS, RoHS, SDS/MSDS or related documentation from upstream suppliers as part of routine material-control procedures.
The purpose of the Nano ZEO documentation is therefore precise: it provides evidence for the ZEO powder/glue material supplied to the converter. It does not automatically mean that the converter’s complete paper, printed board or finished package has been tested or certified.
What Documentation Is Currently Available?
1. SDS/MSDS for Current Products
Nano ZEO maintains an SDS (Safety Data Sheet; formerly called MSDS) applicable to current powder products. Customers may request it after the relevant product, intended use and target market are confirmed. The required SDS format may differ by market.
Because the SDS is a controlled document, its product name, version, revision date and detailed safety conclusions are not reproduced in this public article.
2. 2023 SGS RoHS Report: The Primary Current Evidence
SGS report ETR23702513, issued on 19 July 2023, identifies the sample as 纳米石 ZEO®速溶胶（ZEO/LMS-100-25）. The test basis was RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU and amendment (EU) 2015/863.
The following ten restricted substances were reported as not detected (n.d.):
• Heavy metals: Cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg) and hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) — not detected (n.d.).
• Brominated flame retardants: PBB and PBDE — not detected (n.d.).
• Phthalates: DEHP, BBP, DBP and DIBP — not detected (n.d.).
“Not detected” means that the substance was not detected under the test method and detection limit stated in the report. It should not be interpreted as a claim of absolute zero. Customers using the result for technical filing should review the original report for the method, unit and method detection limit (MDL).
RoHS legally applies to electrical and electronic equipment, not packaging as a product category. Packaging customers commonly use RoHS reports as supply-chain restricted-substance evidence, but the report should not be described as a finished-packaging compliance certificate.
Earlier reports for LMS-100-25 and the ZEO-100 series are retained as historical continuity records. For this article, the 2023 SGS report is the primary current RoHS and heavy-metal reference.
3. Halogen Test for ZEO-LMS-100 Glue
Report CE/2011/55802, dated June 2011, identifies the sample as 纳米 ZEO® 速溶熟胶（ZEO-LMS-100）. Fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine were reported as not detected (ND). The issuing laboratory, test method and MDL should be taken from the original report when the result is used for customer filing.
A total-halogen result is not a PFAS-target analysis. Fluorine reported as ND in this report must not be interpreted as “PFAS-free” or “PFAS not detected.”
Historical Paper and Paperboard Context — Not ZEO Material Samples
The following reports relate to specified brown-paper or brown-paperboard samples. They are retained only as historical paper-material context and are not presented as direct tests of ZEO powder or glue.
• SHAEC1307896001 (May 2013): Brown paper; F, Cl, Br and I reported ND. Verify the laboratory, method and MDL in the original report.
• SHAEC1420932201 (November 2014): Brown paper; F, Cl, Br and I reported ND. Verify the laboratory, method and MDL in the original report.
• SHAHG1003433701 (April 2010): Brown paperboard; chlorine reported ND. Verify the laboratory, method and MDL in the original report.
The original sample name and test scope must always be retained when any historical result is cited.
Why Can a Glue Test Reflect the ZEO Powder Used in Corrugated Bonding?
In the packaging application, ZEO powder is incorporated into glue and used in liquid form at the corrugated-board bonding position. The company’s technical assessment therefore treats the tested ZEO glue as a representative application form of the ZEO powder/glue material.
This means the SGS and halogen results can support the RoHS and restricted-substance safety of ZEO material at the coating or bonding position in corrugated products using the same technology. The evidence applies to the ZEO material and its adhesive application; it does not certify every other component of the finished package.
Because glue contains powder together with water and other formulation components, customers whose restricted-substance specifications require testing of the homogeneous powder itself may request a direct powder test. A customer-specific test can also be arranged when a newer report, a different substance list or a particular MDL is required.
“Not Intentionally Added” Is Not the Same as “Not Detected”
Nano ZEO powder is formulated and manufactured without intentionally added formaldehyde or chlorine-containing substances. This is a formulation and process statement.
It must be distinguished from a laboratory result:
• Not intentionally added describes the formulation and manufacturing decision.
• Not detected is a test result tied to a named sample, method and detection limit.
Nano ZEO currently does not have a formal laboratory report supporting a public claim that formaldehyde was “not detected.” Therefore, this article does not use claims such as “formaldehyde-free,” “zero formaldehyde” or “formaldehyde not detected.”
For halogens, named laboratory reports are available and are cited with their original samples and results.
What Is Not Covered by the Current Documentation?
Food contact
Current status: No formal food-contact report is currently available for the ZEO material, related glue, paper, corrugated board or finished package.
If required: Define the final structure, food type, contact time/temperature and target market, then assess or test the final application.
PFAS
Current status: No dedicated PFAS-target report is currently available.
If required: Define the target PFAS list and regulatory market; total-halogen data cannot replace PFAS analysis.
APEO
Current status: No dedicated APEO report is currently available.
If required: Confirm the sample and required method, then arrange testing if needed.
Finished package
Current status: Material-level reports do not certify the complete package.
If required: Assess paper, inks, coatings, all adhesives and the final construction.
EU PPWR
Current status: The RoHS report is not a declaration of conformity with Regulation (EU) 2025/40.
If required: Review the actual package, packaging component and required technical documentation separately.
U.S. TPCH/state packaging rules
Current status: No market-wide claim is made in this article.
If required: Confirm the destination state and current customer specification before issuing a declaration.
RoHS results do not replace food-contact, PFAS, APEO, PPWR, TPCH or finished-package assessment.
Report Dates, Verification and Retesting
A laboratory report does not have one universal acceptance period. Customer, retailer and market requirements may differ, and a new report may be needed after a formulation change or when a customer specifies a recent test, a homogeneous powder sample, a different method or a lower MDL.
The 2023 SGS report is the primary current reference in this article. Reports from 2010–2014 are historical records only. Before using any report for procurement or compliance filing, customers should verify the report copy, sample identity, issuing laboratory, method, unit and MDL through Nano ZEO and the verification information shown on the original report.
What Can Customers Request?
Customers, packaging plants and quality teams can submit a document or testing request through nanozeo.cn. To identify the correct document, please provide:
1. Product name or model and whether the requested sample is powder, glue, paper or a finished package.
2. Intended application and whether the ZEO material is used at a corrugated bonding position.
3. Destination market and the customer’s restricted-substance or regulatory list.
4. Required report age, test method, MDL and project deadline, if specified.
Nano ZEO can then confirm the applicable SDS, identify the relevant SGS/laboratory report, or assess whether customer-specific testing is needed.
FAQ
Does the RoHS Report Certify the Complete Corrugated Package?
No. It provides restricted-substance evidence for the named ZEO glue sample and corresponding material application. The complete package includes other paper, inks, coatings and adhesives that require their own assessment.
Does Fluorine ND in the Halogen Report Mean PFAS-Free?
No. Total-halogen screening and PFAS-target analysis are different. The 2011 halogen result is not a PFAS statement.
Is Nano ZEO Approved for Food Contact?
No formal food-contact report is currently presented. Food-contact use requires a separate review of the final package and target market.
Can a Customer Request Direct Testing of the Powder?
Yes. Direct powder testing can be assessed when the customer requires a homogeneous-material sample, a recent report, a specific substance list or a defined MDL.
How Can a Customer Obtain the SDS?
Submit the product, use and target-market information through nanozeo.cn. The company will confirm the applicable controlled document.
Conclusion
Nano ZEO provides documented safety evidence for the ZEO powder/glue material used in corrugated-board bonding. The main current evidence is the 2023 SGS RoHS report for ZEO/LMS-100-25, supported by halogen and historical test records.
For corrugated products using the same ZEO technology, the RoHS restricted-substance safety of the coating or bonding position can be reasonably relied upon. At the same time, transparent scope matters: material-level evidence is not a certification of the complete package, a food-contact surface or every untested substance.
Related Reading
简体中文
内容整理：nanozeo.cn
首次发布：2026年9月24日
更新日期：2026年9月24日
AI 摘要
• 纳米 ZEO® 备有包装用 ZEO 胶粉／胶水材料的安全资料。客户确认适用产品与用途后，可申请 SDS（安全技术说明书，旧称 MSDS）。
• SGS 报告 ETR23702513（2023 年 7 月 19 日）显示，报告所列试样纳米石 ZEO®速溶胶（ZEO/LMS-100-25）的十项 RoHS 受限物质均为未检出（n.d.）。
• 卤素报告 CE/2011/55802 显示，报告所列试样纳米 ZEO® 速溶熟胶（ZEO-LMS-100）的氟、氯、溴、碘均为未检出。
• RoHS 的法定适用对象是电子电气设备。在包装供应链中，该报告可作为受限物质证据，但不是最终包装的法规认证。
• 这些资料可支持 ZEO 材料在瓦楞纸板粘合位置的安全性，但不代表整张纸材、最终包装、食品接触面、PFAS 状态或所有未检测物质。
证据状态速览
SDS
目前证据：现行产品受控 SDS，可依申请提供。
适当用途：确认产品与用途后的安全资料沟通。
RoHS 十项物质
目前证据：SGS ETR23702513；十项均为 n.d.。
适当用途：报告所列 ZEO 胶水试样及相应粘合应用的受限物质证据。
卤素
目前证据：CE/2011/55802；F、Cl、Br、I 为 ND。
适当用途：报告所列 ZEO-LMS-100 胶水试样的卤素证据。
甲醛
目前证据：未刻意添加；没有正式未检出报告。
适当用途：仅作为配方／制程声明。
PFAS、APEO、食品接触
目前证据：目前没有专项报告。
适当用途：须另行评估或送测。
PPWR、TPCH、最终包装合规
目前证据：RoHS 报告不能建立这些结论。
适当用途：须依市场、包装组件或最终成品另行确认。
为什么包装客户会要求上游提供安全资料？
包装厂经常需要依客户要求，向每一家上游材料供应商收集安全资料。当最终包装用于玩具、电子产品或其他受品牌、零售商及供应链要求管理的商品时，这类文件要求尤其常见。
纳米 ZEO 胶水用于瓦楞纸结构内部的粘合位置，通常不会接触被包装物品，也不会出现在包装的外露表面。即便如此，下游工厂仍可能在例行材料管理中，要求上游供应商提供 SGS、RoHS、SDS／MSDS 或相关资料。
因此，纳米 ZEO 文件的用途应清楚界定：它证明供应给包装厂的 ZEO 胶粉／胶水材料本身的安全表现，并不自动代表包装厂生产的整张纸材、印刷纸板或最终包装已经通过相同检测或认证。
目前可以提供哪些资料？
1. 现行产品的 SDS／MSDS
纳米 ZEO 备有适用于现行粉体产品的 SDS（安全技术说明书，旧称 MSDS）。客户提出申请后，公司会确认相关产品、预定用途与目标市场，再提供适用文件。不同市场所需的 SDS 格式可能不同。
由于 SDS 属于受控文件，本公开文章不列出其中的正式产品名称、版本、修订日期或详细安全结论。
2. 2023 年 SGS RoHS 报告：目前的主要证据
SGS 报告 ETR23702513 于 2023 年 7 月 19 日出具，报告所列试样名称为纳米石 ZEO®速溶胶（ZEO/LMS-100-25）。检测依据为 RoHS 指令 2011/65/EU 及修订指令 (EU) 2015/863。
以下十项受限物质的结果均为未检出（n.d.）：
• 重金属：镉（Cd）、铅（Pb）、汞（Hg）、六价铬（Cr6+）——未检出（n.d.）。
• 溴系阻燃剂：PBB、PBDE——未检出（n.d.）。
• 邻苯二甲酸酯：DEHP、BBP、DBP、DIBP——未检出（n.d.）。
“未检出”表示在报告所列检测方法与检出限下没有检出，不应解释为绝对为零。客户若将结果用于采购或合规归档，应查阅原报告中的检测方法、单位与方法检出限（MDL）。
RoHS 的法定适用对象是电子电气设备，而不是包装这一产品类别。包装客户常把 RoHS 报告作为供应链受限物质证据，但不应把它描述为最终包装的合规证书。
LMS-100-25 与 ZEO-100 系列的较早期报告继续作为历史连续性资料保存。本篇文章以 2023 年 SGS 报告作为目前主要的 RoHS 与重金属证据。
3. ZEO-LMS-100 胶水的卤素检测
报告 CE/2011/55802 的日期为 2011 年 6 月，报告所列试样名称为纳米 ZEO® 速溶熟胶（ZEO-LMS-100）。报告显示氟、氯、溴、碘均为未检出（ND）。客户用于技术归档时，应以原报告登记发证实验室、检测方法与 MDL。
总卤素检测与 PFAS 标的物分析是不同方法。此报告中的氟 ND 不能解释为“无 PFAS”或“PFAS 未检出”。
纸材与纸板的历史资料——并非 ZEO 材料试样
以下报告对应指定棕色纸或棕色纸板，仅作为纸材历史背景，不作为 ZEO 粉体或胶水的直接检测报告。
• SHAEC1307896001（2013 年 5 月）：棕色纸；氟、氯、溴、碘为 ND。以原报告核对实验室、方法与 MDL。
• SHAEC1420932201（2014 年 11 月）：棕色纸；氟、氯、溴、碘为 ND。以原报告核对实验室、方法与 MDL。
• SHAHG1003433701（2010 年 4 月）：棕色纸板；氯为 ND。以原报告核对实验室、方法与 MDL。
引用任何历史结果时，都必须保留原试样名称与检测范围。
为什么胶水检测能够反映瓦楞纸粘合应用中的 ZEO 粉体？
在包装应用中，ZEO 粉体会加入胶水，并以液态形式使用在瓦楞纸板的粘合位置。依公司的技术判定，送测的 ZEO 胶水可视为 ZEO 胶粉／粉体在实际粘合应用中的代表形态。
因此，SGS 与卤素检测结果可以支持采用相同技术的瓦楞纸产品中，ZEO 材料在涂层或粘合位置的 RoHS 与受限物质安全性。该证据适用于 ZEO 材料及其粘合应用，但不代表最终包装中的其他材料也已经通过检测。
由于胶水包含粉体、水与其他配方成分，如果客户的受限物质规范要求以均质粉体本身送测，可另行评估粉体直接检测。客户如要求近期报告、不同物质清单或特定 MDL，也可规划专项测试。
“未刻意添加”不等于“未检出”
纳米 ZEO 粉体的配方与制造过程未刻意添加甲醛或含氯物质。这是配方与制程声明。
它必须与实验室结果分开理解：
• 未刻意添加：说明配方选择与制造过程。
• 未检出：说明特定试样在指定方法与检出限下的检测结果。
纳米 ZEO 目前没有正式实验室报告支持公开宣称甲醛“未检出”。因此，本篇不使用“不含甲醛”“零甲醛”或“甲醛未检出”等说法。
卤素方面则有具名实验室报告，本文依原试样与原结果进行说明。
目前资料不涵盖哪些项目？
食品接触
目前状态：目前没有 ZEO 材料、相关胶水、纸材、瓦楞纸板或最终包装的正式食品接触报告。
客户如有要求：明确最终结构、食品类型、接触时间／温度与目标市场，再评估或测试最终应用。
PFAS
目前状态：目前没有 PFAS 标的物专项报告。
客户如有要求：明确 PFAS 清单与目标法规；总卤素资料不能替代 PFAS 分析。
APEO
目前状态：目前没有 APEO 专项报告。
客户如有要求：确认试样与要求方法后，视需要安排检测。
最终包装
目前状态：材料层级报告不能认证完整包装。
客户如有要求：对纸材、油墨、涂层、所有胶黏剂与最终结构进行评估。
欧盟 PPWR
目前状态：RoHS 报告不是 Regulation (EU) 2025/40 的符合性声明。
客户如有要求：依实际包装、包装组件与所需技术文件另行审查。
美国 TPCH／州包装规则
目前状态：本文不提出跨市场的一般符合性声明。
客户如有要求：先确认目的州与客户最新规范，再决定声明或检测需求。
RoHS 结果不能替代食品接触、PFAS、APEO、PPWR、TPCH 或最终包装评估。
报告年份、查验与复测
实验室报告没有适用于所有客户的统一接受期限。客户、零售商与市场要求可能不同；当配方变更，或客户要求近期报告、均质粉体试样、不同方法或更低 MDL 时，可能需要重新检测。
本文以 2023 年 SGS 报告作为主要现行参考；2010–2014 年报告仅作为历史资料。任何报告用于采购或合规归档前，都应通过纳米 ZEO 及原报告所列查验信息，核对报告副本、试样名称、发证实验室、方法、单位与 MDL。
客户可以提出哪些资料需求？
客户、包装厂及质量团队可通过 nanozeo.cn 提交文件或检测需求。为确认正确资料，请提供：
1. 产品名称或型号，以及需要粉体、胶水、纸材还是最终包装作为试样。
2. 预定用途，以及 ZEO 材料是否用于瓦楞纸粘合位置。
3. 目标市场与客户指定的受限物质或法规清单。
4. 如有指定，请提供报告年限、检测方法、MDL 与项目期限。
纳米 ZEO 将据此确认适用 SDS、对应的 SGS／实验室报告，或评估是否需要专项检测。
常见问题
RoHS 报告是否代表整件瓦楞包装已经通过认证？
不是。报告提供的是指定 ZEO 胶水试样及对应材料应用的受限物质证据。完整包装还包含纸材、油墨、涂层及其他胶黏剂，需要分别评估。
卤素报告中的氟 ND 是否代表无 PFAS？
不是。总卤素筛查与 PFAS 标的物分析不同，2011 年卤素结果不能作为 PFAS 声明。
纳米 ZEO 是否已通过食品接触认证？
本文目前没有列示正式食品接触报告。食品接触用途必须依最终包装与目标市场另行审查。
客户可以要求直接检测粉体吗？
可以。当客户要求均质材料试样、近期报告、指定物质清单或特定 MDL 时，可评估粉体直接检测。
如何申请 SDS？
请通过 nanozeo.cn 提交产品、用途与目标市场信息，公司确认后提供适用的受控文件。
结论
纳米 ZEO 可为用于瓦楞纸板粘合的 ZEO 胶粉／胶水材料提供安全证据。目前的主要证据是 ZEO/LMS-100-25 的 2023 年 SGS RoHS 报告，并由卤素及历史检测资料补充。
对采用相同 ZEO 技术的瓦楞纸产品，涂层／粘合位置的 RoHS 受限物质安全性可以合理信赖。同时，证据边界必须透明：材料层级的报告不等于整件包装、食品接触面或所有未检测物质的安全认证。
延伸阅读
